Showing posts with label austin aries. Show all posts
Showing posts with label austin aries. Show all posts

Sunday, December 15, 2013

TNA Plot Hole: Why was Austin Aries in the Feast or Fired Match?


On the 12-12-13 edition of Impact Wrestling featured the Feast or Fired Match. Feast or Fired is a match where 4 briefcases are put above each turnbuckle. Each briefcase features either an X-Division Title Match, World Heavyweight Title Match, Tag Team Title Match, or a Pink Slip. Austin Aries earlier in the show defeated Chris Sabin for the X-Division Championship. Aries then later on competed in the Feast or Fired Match.

What doesn't make sense: Why was Austin Aries allowed to compete in the Feast or Fired match even though he was already X-Division Champion? In theory, what would TNA have done if Austin Aries pulled down the briefcase containing the X-Division Title Shot while he was X-Division Champion? He obviously can't fight himself so it made absolutely no sense why he was allowed in the match. This is what is wrong with wrestling today. There's no thought given to common sense logic. 

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Should Christy Hemme Sue TNA For Sexual Harassment?


On Impact Wrestling this past Thursday, Christy Hemme botched the introduction of Bobby Roode and Austin Aries. Austin Aries cornered Christy Hemme basically demanding she get it right. She does it over, and Austin Aries climbs the turnbuckle in front of Christy Hemme and his crotch is near her face.

It's been said that this was NOT a work. That what Aries did should be considered sexual harassment, and you got Mark Madden calling on Hemme to sue Dixie Carter and TNA. You got the IWC in an uproar saying he should be suspended.

Let's assume it's not a work. What Austin Aries did was wrong. No question about it. He should be reprimanded, make a public apology to Christy Hemme, possibly suspended for a month without pay, and take a sexual harassment class.

If Christy Hemme wants to sue TNA, then by all means sue TNA. BUT She'll never win in court and I'll tell you why. All Austin Aries has to tell the court is that he was just "acting in character" and Hemme will lose. Whether or not he really was in character or not is irrelevant. Once his entrance music hit and he walked out from behind the curtain in front of the cameras he was considered to be "In Character". That is a fact. Austin Aries character is that of an arrogant bad guy. That is a fact. Austin Aries grabbed the mic and cut a promo on her in character before climbing the turnbuckle. That is a fact which further adds credibility to the perception that Austin Aries climbing the turnbuckle with his groin in her face was just him acting in character.

Now, here's the thing that everyone overlooks that adds credibility to Austin Aries. He NEVER grabbed her, put his hands on her, or touched her with any private parts of his body. In fact right before he climbed the turnbuckle, Christy Hemme put her hand on his shoulder. After he climbed the turnbuckle she put her hand on his right thigh and pushed him at the same time he jumped off the turnbuckle. She put her hands on him twice. That is a fact. Also Bobby Roode went with him to the corner that she was in so it just made it seem like they were acting like heels.

Do I think Austin Aries took it too far? Yes. But do I think she would win a lawsuit over it? Absolutely not. Once his music hits he is considered to be in character. He cut a HEEL promo right before climbing the turnbuckle. He never grabbed her, physically forced her, or put his private parts on her.

On top of all this, her credibility takes a hit automatically because you can make a case that she has a long track record of presenting herself in a way that is "asking" for that kind of attention. People forget Hemme made a bunch of money by posing nude for Playboy so a bunch of perverts can look at her naked. She wears risque and scantily clad clothing on the Knockouts website, and participates in sexually provocative TNAShop.com commercials. This type of public perception can hurt your credibility in a sexual harassment case of any kind.

And here's the elephant in the room that no one wants to see. Christy Hemme could have climbed out of the ring, but she didn't. James Storm could've stopped Aries, but didn't. James Storm was a babyface so it would not have seemed weird for him to get on to Aries, especially being the guest referee. Bobby Roode could have stopped Aries, but he didn't either. All of this is pretty much the icing on the cake that in the court of law, Aries would win by just claiming he was acting "in character". I feel bad for Christy Hemme, and I do think Aries should get reprimanded. I just don't think her case has a chance in court. 

Sunday, April 7, 2013

TNA Plot Holes: Why Did TNA Deny That Chavo Guerrero Was a World Champion?


This past Thursday on Impact Wrestling, the contract signing took place over the tag team championships. Austin Aries and Bobby Roode vs Chavo Guerrero and Hernandez. The segment was rather entertaining, but I laughed at one major plot hole in this storyline. During the contract signing, Aries claimed that the difference between the two teams is that Aries/Roode have been world champions while Chavo and Hernandez have never been world champion. Aries asked both Chavo and Hernandez if either have been world champion and both men said no.


The plot hole is that Chavo Guerrero in fact is a former world champion. In 2008, Chavo Guerrero defeated CM Punk for the ECW World Title in a no disqualification match. What makes this plot hole even funnier is that Chavo Guerrero actually defended his world title at the grandest stage of them all... Wrestlemania.

(Chavo as ECW Champion at Wrestlemania 24)

Now, some may claim that the reason they denied that he was World Champion is because he won it while in the WWE. If you think that's why, you would be very wrong and I'll tell you why. TNA has no problem acknowledging accolades from other wrestling companies. When Jeff Hardy returned to TNA in 2010, TNA acknowledged his WWE title reigns. TNA has publicly acknowledged on-air Hulk Hogan's WWE Hall of Fame ring. Team 3D has acknowledged WWE, WCW, and ECW tag belts (even showing those belts) live on Impact. So it makes absolutely no sense that TNA would not acknowledge that Chavo Guerrero is a former world champion. They acknowledge everyone else's accolades from other wrestling companies.

I just found that humorous and baffling. Why did Bobby Roode, Austin Aries, and Chavo Guerrero deny that Chavo Guerrero was ever a world champion? Why would TNA deny such a career defining accolade? Why have they acknowledged every other wrestler's accolades from other companies but not Chavo's?

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

TNA Signs Austin Aries to New Long-Term Deal

NEWS: July 17, 2012

Dixie Carter appeared on TNA Today and confirmed that the self-proclaimed "Greatest Man That Ever Lived" and new TNA Heavyweight Champ Austin Aries has been signed to a new long-term deal. This is great news for TNA as Aries could be the mainstream face of the company that TNA has long sought after. This also means that we won't be seeing a situation where Austin Aries walks out of the company with the TNA Heavyweight Title the way CM Punk did in WWE a year ago.

To watch the video of Dixie Carter discussing Austin Aries new long term contract CLICK HERE



TNA Today (July 17) Interview with Dixie Carter - Part 1

Friday, July 13, 2012

TNA Impact 7-12-12: Austin Aries References CM Punk on TNA Impact

After Austin Aries won the TNA Heavyweight Title at Destination X, WWE Champion CM Punk congratulated Austin Aries on Twitter writing the following...

CM Punk: "I didn't see it, but congrats to @austinaries @SamoaJoe and @zematna Looks like somebody finally gets it. Kudos."

On Impact Wrestling last night, Austin Aries indirectly referenced CM Punk in his promo by saying the following:

Austin Aries: "...I even got congratulations from world champions from other wrestling promotions congratulating me on my accomplishments..."

Monday, July 9, 2012

TNA's "Option C" vs WWE's "Money in the Bank". Which is Better?

by Brian Phelps

Recently, WrestleZone columnist Josh Isenberg wrote an article discussing his predictions for TNA's Destination X 2012 pay-per-view. In the article, Isenberg made the comment "This is the beginning of X Division champions being a Money in the Bank Winner." (in reference to "Option C" proposed by Austin Aries that allows the X-Division champion heading into Destination X pay-per-view the opportunity to relinquish the X-Division championship in favor of a shot at the TNA World Heavyweight Championship)

I think that was the silliest way Josh could've described "Option C". To compare Option C to Money in the Bank is ridiculous. They're nothing alike. The mere fact that you are comparing a title to a briefcase is insane on the face of it. Option C requires you to be the X-Division title holder going into the Destination X pay-per-view, which empowers the X-Division title and makes it more prestigious while WWE requires you to win a ladder match that guarantees you a shot at a WWE World Title at any time. The way Money in the Bank has been booked typically breeds weak or cowardly champions that are unable to get over even with a world title. Option C is better because it gives a FIGHTING CHAMPION who has already proven his worth in the X-Division a chance to grab the brass ring while simultaneously making the mid-card title more important as well as emphasizing the importance of the X-Division and the Destination X pay-per-view as a whole. Money in the Bank puts a bunch of random "contenders" (most of which were not contenders a week or two before the match) in a ladder match to decide who ends up becoming the next world champion by some sort of fluke 10 second match. Money in the Bank was supposed to be an easy and quick way to get a wrestler over, but has actually backfired. By winning a World Title via MITB cash-in, you are basically guaranteeing that you are going to be a weak champion that still isn't over (ex. Jack Swagger, Alberto Del Rio, CM Punk). CM Punk won Money in the Bank twice and was never as over from those title wins as he was by doing it the traditional way in 2011 (when he turned "Best in the World"). Option C comes off way better than MITB because the challenger has EVERYTHING to lose while the MITB winner has virtually nothing to lose (the MITB winner is not a champion, thus he has nothing to lose by an actual loss because he will be no worse off after losing his cash-in match than he was before he won MITB). This means that Option C is a more important match than the MITB because it pits the X-Division Champion against the World Heavyweight Champion for all the marbles. I would much rather see two fighting champions headlining a pay-per-view for the world title than a bunch of random guys in a ladder match only to watch the winner gain the World Title by pinning a champion who was already lying in the ring unconscious in a 5-second fluke win lol.

Sorry Josh, but Option C and Money in the Bank are apples and oranges. Option C is better than Money in the Bank. Also, if you know anything about TNA you know that "Feast or Fired" is a rip off of MITB. Option C is actually a moderately original idea. If anything, MITB is more closely related to the Royal Rumble. A bunch of guys competing for a shot at the world title at a later date. It's the same thing, all they did was just change the gimmick match from a battle royal to a ladder match. The basic premise is the exact same though.

Austin Aries Wins TNA Heavyweight Title at Destination X 2012


Austin Aries defeated Bobby Roode for the TNA Heavyweight Title last night at Destination X. In doing so, Austin Aries became the first man to successfully complete "Option C" (Relinquishing the X-Division Title for a shot at the TNA World Title). Congratulations are also in order for Bobby Roode, who now holds the record for longest reign as TNA World Champion at 256 days.